Likewise, I would take out an initial comment that described Safari as Free Software in a blanket way. The single word characterization is not particularly accurate. Grammatically, that much is true, but there's no need for each web browser's page to follow the same grammatical template (and other browsers' pages start slightly differently from either).Īs to the proprietary issue, it's really just explained better in the "History and development" section. S/he suggested this was a better parallel with the IE article. User:Rhobite seems to have an axe to grind about calling Safari "proprietary" in the lead sentence. Preceding unsigned comment added by Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters ( talk
It was suggested that software bloating was probably one of the reasons. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters Another well developed open source layout engine Gecko (of the Mozilla browser) was not chosen.
For example, does the question of whether Gecko is or is not "well developed" need to be discussed here (I agree Gecko is good but for some other page). Do we really need it? And even though a link is provided, the "bloat" explanation seems somewhat POV and/or speculative. 61 Apple Safari and third-party tracking.60 Statement about user base for browser statistic of w3school.57 Safari is no longer updated beyond version 5.1.7 for Windows.54 Demonstration of Ads in mobile (iOS).51 Safari 4.1.3 incompatible with OS X 10.5.4.36 New Interface in Safari 4, Screenshot ready to go.34 Apple's download does not work in Firefox and Opera?.28 PayPal/eBay threatens to block older browsers.
#FLAME BONJOUR BROWSER INSTALL#
0 kommentar(er)
